Fat Grafting vs. Fillers for Facial Volume

Providing facial rejuvenation today is not just about lifting and tightening but also restoring volume to the face that is lost over time. Popular fillers, such as Voluma and Juvederm, can add volume to the mid-face and fill in deep folds and wrinkles. Such is the case with our ViveLift technique. But fat grafting (fat injections or fat transfer) to restore lost volume has gained a lot of popularity in the field of cosmetic surgery and is commonly used today.

Fat grafting and fillers are both popular methods for restoring facial volume, but they differ in several aspects. Fat grafting involves transferring one’s own fat from one area of the body to the face, providing natural volumization that can last for years. On the other hand, fillers are artificial gels injected into specific areas to fill in lines and wrinkles, offering immediate results with shorter recovery time. Consulting with a facial plastic surgeon is recommended to determine which option best suits your individual needs.

So what is all the hype about fat grafting?

UFP has been doing fat injections for a number of years, typically in combination with facelift surgery. Fat, in this case, is a better option as the patient is already under general anesthesia, it can be added to multiple areas of the face, and it’s more cost effective than repeated treatments of manufactured fillers.

That is not to say it’s necessarily better though. Fat can be somewhat unforgiving and it’s important to only trust a surgeon with a lot of experience with fat injections. For small areas or those close to the surface of the skin, there is more of a risk of lumps and bumps than with hyaluronic acid fillers that are very smooth in consistency.

Another factor to consider prior to fat injections is that not all of it will stay in the face. As long as the fat attaches to a blood supply, the results are permanent. But it’s hard to know beforehand how much fat will actually “take”. The good thing is that most people have a decent fat supply available should they decide on a second treatment. At Utah Facial Plastics, most patients achieve beyond satisfactory results following their initial procedure.

Fat Grafting vs. Synthetic Filler Injections

When it comes to restoring facial volume and addressing lines and wrinkles, two popular options are fat grafting and synthetic filler injections. Both techniques have their pros and cons, and understanding the differences between them can help individuals make informed decisions about their desired aesthetic outcomes.

Fat grafting, also known as fat transfer, involves harvesting excess fat from one area of the body (typically the abdomen or thighs) through a minor surgical procedure. Once collected, the fat is processed and injected into specific areas of the face to restore lost volume. On the other hand, synthetic filler injections involve the use of artificial gels that are administered via injection to fill in lines, wrinkles, and areas of volume loss.

The main advantage of fat grafting is its long-lasting effects. As it uses the patient’s own tissue, the results can be more permanent compared to synthetic fillers. Additionally, fat grafting allows for natural-looking results since it utilizes one’s own fat cells. It also has the added benefit of simultaneously contouring other parts of the body where the excess fat is harvested from.

While both techniques have their benefits, synthetic filler injections offer certain advantages as well. First and foremost, they provide immediate results with little to no downtime required for recovery. This makes them a convenient option for those seeking quick enhancements or for special events where time constraints may apply. Synthetic fillers also offer a wide range of options in terms of consistency and texture, allowing for tailored treatments based on individual needs.

For instance, let’s consider a scenario where an individual wishes to address sagging cheeks resulting from age-related volume loss. They could opt for a fat grafting procedure which requires minor surgery but offers longer-lasting results. However, if they have a special event coming up in a week’s time and need rejuvenation without significant downtime, synthetic filler injections would be a more suitable choice.

The decision between fat grafting and synthetic fillers ultimately depends on individual preferences, budget, and desired outcomes. Some individuals may prefer the longevity of fat grafting, even though it requires a slightly longer recovery time. Others may prioritize convenience and immediate results offered by synthetic fillers. The best approach is to consult with a qualified facial plastic surgeon who can assess your unique situation and provide personalized recommendations.

Longevity of Results

When it comes to facial volume restoration, one important aspect to consider is the longevity of the results. This refers to how long the treatment effects will last before additional touch-ups or repeat treatments are needed. In this regard, there is a notable difference between fat grafting and fillers.

Fat grafting has been found to provide longer-lasting results compared to fillers. Studies have shown that fat grafts can maintain volume for several years. This is because fat grafting involves using a patient’s own tissues, harvested from another area of the body such as the abdomen or thighs, and injecting it into the face to restore lost volume.

The transplanted fat cells have the potential to survive and integrate into the surrounding tissues, providing a long-term solution for volume loss. The longevity of fat grafting results can vary depending on factors such as the technique used, individual patient characteristics, and proper post-operative care.

On the other hand, fillers offer more temporary solutions. While they can provide immediate results with minimal downtime and be easily adjusted or reversed if desired, their effects are not permanent. Fillers such as hyaluronic acid or collagen are directly injected into the face to add volume. Over time, these substances are gradually metabolized by the body, leading to a decrease in volume and requiring follow-up treatments to maintain results.

It’s important to note that both fat grafting and fillers offer their own unique advantages and considerations beyond just longevity of results.

Advantages of Fat Grafting

Fat grafting has gained popularity for facial rejuvenation due to several advantages it offers. One significant advantage is that it utilizes a patient’s own tissues, reducing the risk of rejection or allergic reactions. Since the transplanted fat cells come from the patient’s body, there is a lower likelihood of adverse reactions compared to synthetic fillers.

Moreover, fat grafting can provide more natural-looking results compared to fillers. The harvested fat can be carefully strategically injected to restore volume and contour the face in a way that closely mimics youthful facial proportions. Unlike fillers, which are pre-packaged substances with limited options for customization, fat grafting allows for greater control and precision in achieving the desired aesthetic outcome.

Another advantage is that fat grafting can potentially address multiple concerns simultaneously. In addition to restoring volume loss, fat grafting can also improve skin quality and texture. The transplanted fat contains stem cells and growth factors that contribute to tissue regeneration, leading to an improvement in overall skin appearance.

While fat grafting has many advantages, it’s important to keep in mind that it is a surgical procedure and may involve a longer recovery time compared to non-invasive filler treatments.

Imagine Sarah, who was looking to restore volume loss on her face while achieving a natural-looking result. She opted for fat grafting due to its advantages, such as using her own tissues and the potential for longer-lasting results. The procedure successfully restored volume and enhanced her skin quality, giving her a refreshed and rejuvenated appearance.

Choosing between fat grafting and fillers is like deciding between planting seeds in your garden or buying pre-grown plants from a store. Fat grafting involves utilizing your body’s own resources and allowing them to grow naturally over time, while fillers offer immediate but temporary solutions.

Feel and Natural Appearance

When it comes to facial volume restoration, the feel and natural appearance of the results are important considerations. This is where the key distinction between fat grafting and filler injections becomes apparent.

With fat grafting, the harvested fat is carefully processed and then strategically injected into areas of the face that require volume restoration. The result is a smooth and natural feel, as the transferred fat integrates seamlessly with the surrounding tissues. It provides a more organic and lifelike appearance since it follows the contours of the face without looking stiff or overfilled. The naturalness of fat transfer can be attributed to its ability to mimic the body’s own tissue, providing a subtle enhancement that blends harmoniously with existing features.

On the other hand, while dermal fillers can effectively restore facial volume and provide immediate results, they may have a slightly different feel compared to fat grafting. Fillers consist of artificial gels that are injected into targeted areas to plump them up. They tend to have rounder contours and a firmer feel due to their synthetic nature [statistics/facts]. While this might not be as natural as the results achieved through fat transfer, dermal fillers still offer a viable option for those seeking convenient and predictable volumization effects.

It’s worth noting that individual preferences may play a significant role when deciding between these options. Some individuals may prioritize a more natural look and feel, opting for fat grafting despite its invasiveness and longer recovery time. Others may prefer the immediate results and versatility offered by fillers, even if they sacrifice some degree of naturalness in exchange.

fat grafting vs fillers for facial volume

Advantages of Synthetic Filler Injections

Synthetic filler injections offer several advantages when it comes to restoring facial volume. One key advantage is the long-lasting effect that these fillers provide. Unlike natural fillers, which may gradually be absorbed by the body over time, synthetic fillers tend to have a more durable effect, offering sustained volume enhancement for a prolonged period. This can be particularly beneficial for individuals seeking longer-term results without the need for frequent touch-ups or repeat treatments.

For instance, imagine a middle-aged woman who desires fuller cheeks to achieve a more youthful appearance. By opting for synthetic filler injections, such as those containing hyaluronic acid or calcium hydroxylapatite, she can enjoy the benefits of restored volume that can last up to a year or more, depending on the specific filler used and individual factors.

Another advantage of synthetic fillers is their versatility in addressing different areas of concern on the face. Whether it’s filling in wrinkles and fine lines, enhancing hollowed cheeks, or augmenting the lips, synthetic fillers can be tailored to meet specific aesthetic goals. The ability to customize treatments makes them an appealing option for individuals looking for comprehensive facial rejuvenation.

Furthermore, synthetic fillers tend to be cost-effective compared to other options like fat grafting. While fat grafting involves a surgical procedure and extracting fat from another area of the body, synthetic filler injections can typically be performed in an office or medical spa setting and require less downtime. This accessibility and convenience make them a preferred choice for many individuals seeking subtle yet noticeable improvements in facial volume.

Despite these advantages, it’s important to note that there are some potential drawbacks to consider with synthetic fillers. These may include temporary side effects like swelling, bruising, or redness at the injection site. Additionally, individual reactions or allergic responses to certain filler ingredients should also be taken into account. It is crucial to have a consultation with a healthcare provider before undergoing any filler treatment to discuss potential risks, benefits, and suitability.

Now that we’ve explored the advantages of synthetic filler injections, let’s move on to another important aspect: immediate and predictable results.

Synthetic filler injections offer long-lasting effects, making them a desirable option for individuals seeking sustained volume enhancement without the need for frequent touch-ups. They also provide versatility in addressing various areas of concern on the face, such as wrinkles, fine lines, hollowed cheeks, and lips. In addition to being cost-effective compared to alternatives like fat grafting, synthetic fillers can be performed in an office or medical spa setting with minimal downtime. However, potential temporary side effects and individual reactions should be considered before undergoing treatment. Overall, synthetic fillers provide immediate and predictable results for comprehensive facial rejuvenation.

Decision Factors: Fat Grafting vs. Fillers

When deciding between fat grafting and dermal fillers, several factors come into play. These factors help determine which option would best suit an individual’s needs and achieve desired outcomes. Let’s explore these decision factors in more detail:

1. Treatment Goals: The specific goals and desired outcomes of the patient play a significant role in determining whether fat grafting or dermal fillers are more suitable. For those seeking larger volume restoration, reshaping, or structural changes, fat grafting might be the preferred choice. Conversely, if the goal is to target specific areas for subtle enhancements or address fine lines and wrinkles, dermal fillers offer greater precision and control.

2. Longevity: Consideration of how long the results are expected to last is crucial. Fat grafting provides longer-lasting results compared to dermal fillers, with some patients experiencing up to 5 years of volumizing effects. However, it’s important to note that individual variations and factors such as metabolism can affect longevity.

3. Surgical vs. Non-surgical Approach: Fat grafting requires a surgical procedure for both harvesting and injecting the fat into the face, whereas dermal fillers are injected non-surgically using fine needles. Some individuals may prefer a non-invasive approach without the downtime associated with surgery.

4. Cost: As discussed earlier, cost is a significant consideration for many patients. While dermal fillers may require periodic maintenance sessions, the initial cost and additional surgical steps involved in fat grafting can make it a more expensive option. However, personal financial situations and long-term goals should be taken into account when evaluating cost-effectiveness.

Aesthetics and Personal Preference

When it comes to choosing between fat grafting and fillers for facial volume restoration, aesthetics and personal preference play a significant role. Each individual has unique facial features, contours, and desired outcomes, which can influence the treatment choice.

Fat grafting is often favored for its natural look and feel. The procedure uses the patient’s own fat extracted from another area of their body, allowing for a personalized approach to volumizing the face. As a result, the injected fat blends seamlessly with the surrounding tissues, providing a more natural and harmonious outcome compared to fillers.

However, some individuals may prefer the immediate results that fillers offer. Fillers are available in various formulations, allowing for targeted volume correction in specific areas of the face. This versatility can be particularly beneficial when addressing specific signs of aging or enhancing particular facial features.

Aesthetic preferences also come into play when considering the longevity of results. While both fat grafting and fillers can provide long-lasting outcomes, fat transfer is generally considered more permanent as the grafted fat cells integrate with existing tissue in the face. On the other hand, fillers typically last from six to 18 months before they gradually metabolize.

It’s essential to consider personal factors such as budgetary constraints and lifestyle when making a decision. Fat transfer tends to be more expensive than fillers due to its surgical nature and longer-lasting effects. Additionally, while fat grafting requires mild recovery with some downtime, fillers have little to no downtime and are more convenient for special events or those with busy schedules.

So how do you know which option is right for you?

Because everyone’s facial anatomy is so different, it’s really a case by case determination by Dr. Thompson. As mentioned above, most patients undergoing facelift surgery will also benefit from fat injections. But they may only need it in one area of the face or he may recommend adding it to multiple areas of the face, even lips that have thinned over time.

For under-eye hollowing, he may suggest either option. It often comes down to whether the patient prefers multiple non-surgical injectable treatments or if they’d rather do one or two in-office surgical procedures for a permanent result. Or instead of adding fat to smooth under-eye hollowing, which he commonly recommends, he may suggest fat repositioning instead, where he uses the fat already in place fill in hollowing.

Bottom line, it’s best to come in for a complimentary consultation to determine which procedure(s) will best help you achieve your aesthetic goals. To do so, contact us HERE or call (801)776-2220.

Related Resources


Let us help you reach your aesthetic goals today!

Contact us at 801-776-2220 to schedule an appointment at our Draper or Layton locations.


Get Started

What happens in a consultation?

  1. Get to know your team.

  2. Help us understand you and your goals.

  3. Learn about our services and specialties.

How May We Help?

"*" indicates required fields

SMS Agreement
* All indicated fields must be completed.
Please include non-medical questions and correspondence only.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Accessibility Toolbar

Scroll to Top